Who Hates the Homeless the Most?

There are people in America who genuinely need a hand. These people are mentally unstable, physically incapable of work, have a debilitating addiction which is ruining their life, or through fate have been dealt a bad hand and just need a little help to lift themselves up and out of their current situation. People run from abusive relationships with no friends or relatives. People run away from home because of abuse or their own foolish pride. People get hit with the one two punch of losing a job and having a serious health problem. All of these people genuinely need help, either by being committed to mental instiutions, rehab facilities, or self-development programs to give them the resources to exchange their work for food, shelter, or education.

There are people though, who deserve a red-hot poker in the eye because they are conning well-meaning people into giving them money. People are using others' sense of good-will and stealing money from them. These fake homeless, free-loading vagabonds, and homeless criminals are hardening peoples hearts to those who genuinely need help. They're causing well-meaning politicians to make terrible policies based on the terrible plight of the "hundreds of thousands of homeless in America". We need to quit giving away free money to anyone who has their hand out, and at the same time expect a higher level of personal-responsibility from those who do genuinely need outside assistance.

These videos should enrage anyone who actually gives a shit about helping people. Sadly though, every single one of my own experiences in talking with homeless people falls so close to these video descriptions it's disheartening. I want to help, but I sure as shit never want my money to ever go to these cons.

John Stossel doing a report on homeless people:


In San Diego I took some evenings and talked with the homeless on the beaches. I only spoke to 6-8 homeless people, but they were eerily similar:

• terrible hygeine (despite very accessible public showers)
• constant, excessive drinking (24 oz. cans of Bud Ice seemed to be most common)
• abusing nearby homeless resources to maintain their lifestyle of just floating around with no responsibilities
• not even attempting to locate any kind of employment

I feel genuinely bad for those who, through no fault of their own have had hard luck hit them again and again. As a society we need to make available a safety net for those who need help, if for no other reason than to appease the vast majority of the public who need to believe that America is a good place. This help must be decentralized and community oriented. This will allow individuals to monitor people's progress and determine whether the resources being given are being exploited or not.

Anyone who is entirely capable of work and responsibility, but is opting out for their own reasons, will never get any pity from me, I just see way too much opportunity in this country for me to feel bad for someone.

If Mexican immigrants can come into this country with nothing, and make a life for themselves and their families, any physically capable and mentally stable homeless person has no excuse.

I'm back...

What follows is going to be a little different.  Gotta study for USMLE Step 1, gotta keep the Missus & Munchkin happy, and I have to stay sane.  If I treat this blog as a relief valve, maybe it'll help me. 

I've been making terrible choices lately regarding time management, and personal development.  Had a 2 weeks stretch where I was studying terrifically, but I've fallen off the wagon.  Classwork is accumulating, and I have to tough out a week and a half before break begins.  I can do this. 

Remove...

Choose...

Do insurance companies scrape too much off the top?

Mark Perry over at Carpe Diem makes it known that insurance companies are making an average of 3.3% profit.  Removing that 3.3% equates to roughly $150-250 in personal/family rate savings per policy?  Removing all insurance profit is not a panacea. 

Also, as a matter of point we should consider that insurance is insurance, not a universal payment system for which everyone always benefits (paying less in premiums than they consume in medical services).

An insurance company is essentially betting individuals. The company bets that premiums will be larger than the cost of healthcare services rendered. Why should a company "bet" a sick individual that $300, $500, or more a month will cover their expenses for, let's say, dialysis. That company is not evil for not charging $300 a month when it knows it'll be paying out $1000-$2000 a month.

The country needs social safety nets, and for catastrophic care I fully support an expansion of medicaid. We must pay for it though. Increase taxes (and not just on the evil rich).

Healthcare is expensive not only because medical technology marches forward providing services not imagined 20-30 years ago, but because reimbursement happens through a 3rd party (whose financial interest is at odds with both provider and consumer of care). When this is coupled with the fact that individuals could care less how much a doctor's visit "costs" because, well "insurance" covers it. How much does a physical cost? Doesn't matter, I'll pay my co-pay and it'll get done. Should I bring my mildly feverish child to the ER? I'll pay my co-pay and the rest will be insurance. People must be aware and make their health care decisions based on efficiency, cost, and their own personal situation. Again, I support an expansion of medicaid, but make the cost 100% known and up-front with an increase in taxes.

Doctor's, hospitals, and individuals are not awash with money. Insurance companies make billions because of the sheer volume of care that they oversee. To weed out health fraud, rules are thought up and sometimes seem draconian. So the evil billions they make, and the evil decisions they make, are made as a matter of fiduciary responsibility, of which you mentioned.

John Stossel on health care costs.


Another take on breaking down how the insurance companies are at odds with both providers and consumers.

This last link is super quick to distill the information presented...

Sorry for the book. I hate seeing individuals or groups of individuals demonized for making choices which are in their own self-interest.

Why Get Into Politics?

North Korea is dark...



The only thing keeping the population of North Korea back is politics. The difference between North Korea and South Korea could not be more stark. I was just reminded of this by a slideshow of North Korea at Foreign Policy. Sad...

Be sure to check out one of North Korea's arcades too!

Innocent Pastor Beaten to Fight Drugs/Illegal Immigrants

This is disturbing stuff. Hat tip Classically Liberal.



Another video I watched just recently of someone else being harassed at an internal border checkpoint. This guy sounds incredibly annoying, but isn't doing anything illegal. Luckily this guy gets away without being beaten and his car getting trashed.

Rationalistic / Atheistic Video

Entertaining. 10min. long. Hat tip to The Macho Response.

The End of Empathy

Since when do we have to care about everything and everyone. Is it possible and even desireable. How functional would you be if you had infinite sensitivity to every perceived ill in the world? The link is to an article to a seemingly left-leaning author who is worried about his own ambivalence towards violence halfway across the world. Maybe ambivalence isn't the right word. Rather, he's concerned that he can still function day to day in America, with terrible ills happening to others.

I think humans are wired to naturally care most strongly about immediate family for evolutionary reasons. To me, it seems counter-productive to rock back and forth in the fetal position if Kim Jong-Il continues to violently oppress his own people. I think it's terrible, I'm not sure if we need to act militarily because of it, but ultimately I'll still go out and water my flowers all the same.

George Carlin on Environmentalism

There's a good stuff here. I'm surprised I haven't seen this one before.

Not surprised...

Interviewing some Obama voters:



Here's an interview with www.fivethirtyeight.com (left leaning election tracking website) regarding this video. This was done back in Nov.

I'm not surprised by this selection of Obama supporters, but I'm not exactly convinced the republican side would be considerably better. I'm sure you could easily get many seemingly well spoken, outgoing, McCain voters who would say equally dumb stuff.

Though this will be fun to watch play itself out, I'm sure it'll end up like this in the media:
- Republicans are calling Democratic voters retarted
- Republicans aren't willing to be as hard on their own just as ill-informed voters
- Republicans hate Obama and aren't willing to accept the will of the people
blah blah blah

I'm excited to see what the next few years holds. I don't think the world is crumbling all around me, but I really wish the liberal side wasn't chosen this time around. I'm most excited to see how race politics will evolve in the next 4,8,12 or so years. I've already heard people predict Bobby Jindall for the Rep. ticket next go round (either 4 or 8 years potentially).

Was October the Coldest October Ever, Ever???

Apparently not. There's also something called the Climate Audit. It may be worth checking it out sometime.